My Technorati profile

Why Colleges Support BYOD

Postsecondary students once looked to academic departments for recommendations on which computing products to purchase and bring to class. But today’s generation of college students is far more technologically savvy. They tend to use their own mobile computing devices daily in both their personal and academic lives. Indeed, Student Monitor, a provider of college student–centric market research services, found that 88 percent of students access the web every day to do research, engage in social networking, check e-mail, text friends, collaborate or create content.

Not surprisingly, this consumerization of technology has helped fuel the use of mobile devices on college and university campuses. At the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, for example, 27,500 students and 9,700 faculty and staff members have registered 75,000 devices for use on the university’s wireless network, which averages out to 2.1 devices per user. (Some institutions have reported device-to- student ratios as high as 3.5-to-1.)

Doyle Friskney, chief technology officer at the University of Kentucky, believes this student-driven model has become so infused in the campus culture that it’s become impossible to institutionally direct and control. Indeed, in many ways, students are now setting the IT agenda. Although the implications of this new reality for campuses are still unfolding, those that don’t quickly adapt are likely to see their ability to compete for the best students weaken.

Students increasingly see technology as paramount to their academic success, and they expect colleges and universities to support their technology needs and expectations. According to the 21st Century Campus Report, 87 percent of current college students considered technology offerings when deciding which institution to attend. And 92 percent of current high school students said that technology will be a key differentiator during their university selection process.

And it’s not just because they prefer using their own devices. A BYOD environment that’s well-supported by institutions — and integrated into their current long-term academic and technology strategies — offers several key advantages to students:

  • Enables technology-rich classrooms: The 21st Century Campus Report found that technology is slowly being adopted into college and university curricula. Notably, 31 percent of students used technology as a learning tool while in class in 2011 (up from 19 percent in 2010). Pervasive BYOD will help foster this trend, as faculty will be able to assume that most students have access to mobile computing devices and have confidence that the requisite wireless bandwidth is available to support them.
  • Initiates new ways of learning: According to Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, mobility and wireless connectivity are creating new kinds of learners who are more self-directed in their acquisition and sharing of knowledge, more inclined to collaborate and more reliant on feedback.
  • Increases student engagement: Students who use their own personal devices for anytime, anywhere access will engage more in classroom activities, collaborate more fully with classmates, communicate with faculty and learn how to solve problems using the latest skills.

See Full Article (EdTech): Here

Infographic: Technology use on College Campuses

Is your campus using technology or is there still a great divide between students and faculty?

 

 

See Full image (online colleges): Here

Getting Into the College of Your Dreams

 

See full Article (OnlineCollege.org): Here

Teachers: Embrace Technology or Students Will Leave You Behind

We ask our students to be good observers, consider the world carefully and to analyze the implications of what they see. As educators, it’s time we do the same.

Our classrooms may appear as we experienced them — a row of windows, a blackboard (OK, maybe they’re white now), inspirational posters. But the kids looking back from those same uncomfortable chairs are fundamentally different. They are like a Bronze Age tribe being asked to use stone axes. It’s time to put down the stone.

It’s true, no matter what we do, our kids will leave us behind — it’s the natural way. But we must provide them with the knowledge they need to improve the world. Our generation is the one developing all the new tools that offer limitless access to knowledge. So, why wouldn’t we offer these advantages — the ones kids can’t keep their fingers off of, even during class — and help kids acquire the skills they need to survive in a connected world?

To be fair, we have begun to transition away from “stone.” Textbooks, for example, are being digitized. But is that sufficient change? The good news is that our children will no longer be lugging twenty pounds of pulp on their backs. Revisions to their reading content can be updated on the fly, not each decade with new printings.

But is that really leveraging the full power of technology? If you think about how we use technology in our adult lives, it’s primarily a communication experience — email, WebEx, text messages and collaboration tools. It’s social, but we’re not letting these collaborative tools into the classroom.

We’d be blind not to recognize and utilize students’ inclination for social interaction and their obsession with mobile technology. This is our opportunity to join them on this side of the millennium. If we don’t, we will lose their attention, and to some degree, their respect. They know we’re teaching them, for the most part, like we were taught — like our parents were taught.

Here’s some typical summer AP English homework: “Read Walden and write a report on Thoreau’s theme.” I’d bet that SparkNotes sees a surge of traffic in the last week of summer. It’s not that Walden doesn’t contain big ideas relevant to today’s kids. But they’ll do better by constructing meaning from it socially — not alone with a text and a Google search for “Walden Thoreau Themes.” They need something tangible to learn by imitation or iteration, which is the way we all learn most everything. They need to see and hear what academic discourse sounds, looks and feels like.

I understand this is easier said than done. The best solutions are still being explored and developed. But there are many online resources that are changing education significantly. Companies are spending capital to develop interactive visions for math and science. curricula. There are some great solutions out there, and it’s just beginning. But it takes the will and desire for change to ensure today’s students are taught in a way that is relevant. If used correctly, the tools of the 21st century leverage the best of the old and build on the successes of traditional teaching.

See Full Article (Mashable): Here

 

Are For-Profit universities better educating students than traditional universities?

Andrew Rosen has written a great new book on higher education in America,Change.edu: Rebooting for the New Talent Economy.  It is provocative, insightful, and mostly correct. Yet, I predict, it will be largely ignored by the higher-education community.

Image via Google Images

One reason: Rosen is the CEO of Kaplan Higher Education, and probably viewed by many as a biased supporter of for-profit schools, rather than a serious commentator on the general strengths and weaknesses of America’s colleges and universities (this is somewhat ironic, since he has degrees from Duke and Yale, and has lots of nice things to say regarding traditional higher education).

Rosen makes five big points. First, higher education once in a great while is hit with a truly disruptive innovation. He cites the rise of the private-sector (for-profit) schools as one such disruption, and also considers the Morrill Act (which created land-grant schools) and the postwar explosive expansion of universities and community colleges as such examples of disruptive innovations.

Second, Rosen argues that many universities have lost sight of their noble mission because they have been stricken by Harvard Envy, trying to emulate the nation’s most prestigious schools.

Third, much of conventional higher education is an ever more expensive exercise in the dilution of learning and the development of frivolous resort communities (campuses) with emphasis on climbing walls, football, and luxury housing.

Fourth, the for-profits are incentivized to focus on student outcomes and learning—paying laser-like attention to this most critical mission of higher education.

Lastly, the attacks on the for-profits for various transgressions are wide of the mark, and, indeed, dollar for dollar, those schools deliver the best value to taxpayers for educating millions of Americans.

Of course, that is what you might expect a CEO of a for-profit college to say. But Rosen says it well, backed up with evidence. He repeats what other observers, including myself, have said for years.  Conventional higher education has largely lost its way, losing sight of its original and noble mission of educating large numbers of Americans at a reasonable cost. It has gotten caught up in a costly academic arms race to try to be Harvard, when we cannot have (or even afford) many Harvards.

See Full Article (Chronicle): Here

 

K12 Schools Say: iPads Motivate Kids to Learn

At three elementary schools in Clover, South Carolina, students can’t wait to see if there is a gray cart in their classroom. 

“I want you to go to the one we were working on with decimals,” said fifth grade teacher Jennifer Johnson as she handed out iPads to her math students.  The application they’re using reinforces a lesson she’s been teaching, and immediately, the children are immersed.

“We’re golden. I mean look at them. They’re engaged. They are ready to go. They will practice math all day long,” she said.

Next door to Johnson’s room, Megan Charles’ reading class is studying westward expansion and the book Hard Gold.

“They had to explain it in StoryKit, which is an app. They had to do an illustration,” Charles explained.

“Right now, I’m in the paint and I’m actually drawing a picture of Miss Eliza,” added student Catherine Faulkner, who also did an audio recording of her project.

“These games explain things better for me because I’m a visual learner,” said Logan Pubentz, also a fifth grader.

Ask Logan, Catherine and fellow student Jude Bechtel about working on the iPad and they’ll give you ever energetic responses.

“When you come in and see the iPad cart, you are really excited,” Catherine said.

“We get more oomph into it other than just paper and pencil,” Jude said.

“The teachers help us with it. It is not just like the iPad doing all the work,” Logan explained.

Teachers do make sure the technology isn’t used to babysit. Time is limited and all the applications the students use are pre-screened and tied to their lessons.

“This is a tool. And I think behind every tool is a good educator that knows how to use the tool,” Johnson said.

The school did assessments before the iPads went into classrooms 10 weeks ago. They’re expecting to see great improvement when they test again in the spring.

“Great gains, absolutely,” said Charles. “They just pick up technology.  It is very natural for them.”

It is so natural to them, that as NewsChannel 36 interviewed both teachers, the students paid little attention.

“I’m standing here interviewing you and these kids are paying no attention to us,” I joked.

“No. No. They are focused. This is the computer generation,” Johnson said.  “A lot of times they don’t even ask questions because they can solve their own problems,” Charles added.

In all, Larne Elementary has 90 iPads, and 75 are for students to use.  The school gets Title I funding and used a portion of that money to buy the technology.  Administrators say the iPads are serving not only as a teaching tool, but also a motivator.  Staff tells a story of a student who told his parent he had to go to school because he knew it was iPad day in one of his classes.

See Full Article (WCNC): Here

Univ. of Tennessee Knoxville uses iPad to control Solar Decathlon Entry

The U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2011 teams each produced a video walk-through to highlight their house design and provide an accurate look at the interior. This video, produced in August 2011 by The University of Tennessee, will be judged as part of the Communications Contest for the Solar Decathlon competition, held in Washington, D.C., September 23 — October 2, 2011.

Univ. of Kentucky Dorm is a Live-In iPad Experience

Students moving into a newly renovated dormitory at the University of Kentucky signed up for a hyperwired college experience: Each one was given an iPad and required to take a series of tech-themed courses.

The unusual program is called A&S Wired Residential College and is housed in a dorm of 177 freshmen, who plan to major in a variety of fields.

Among the $1-million in renovations are 20 wireless access points in the basement and first floor—enough to serve 75 high-bandwidth users at the same time—11 large-screen televisions, which can be connected with multiple iPads simultaneously; and two 82-inch “interactive whiteboards.” The whiteboards will be in the dorm’s two smart classrooms, which both also have 55-inch televisions. The classrooms can do international videoconferencing, too; one class in the spring will feature interaction with a class in South Africa, says Mark Kornbluh, dean of the University of Kentucky’s College of Arts and Sciences.

“We see this as sort of a laboratory of different teaching technologies,” he says. The students in the dorm are meant to be a microcosm of the university, and the related courses are in subjects including “Social Connections: The Sweet and the Bitter of Relationships,” “The Vietnam War,” and “The African-American Experience in Kentucky.”

Each course will be tied in some way to technology. The course on relationships, for instance, will have a focus on social networks. The physics class will require students to use the iPad in science labs, said the course’s professor, Michael Cavagnero, who is chairman of the department of physics and astronomy.

The iPad can serve as a compass to measure magnetic fields, he notes. It has a built-in camera, so it can serve as a spectrometer to measure light source, and an accelerometer, which can measure how fast it is moving.

Students in the class will do regular physics coursework but will also be asked to come up with four projects during the eight-week course. It’s meant to be an “exploratory course,” Mr. Cavagnero says, adding that it is “intended to be as much fun as anything else.”

The overall goal of the high-tech dorm, Mr. Kornbluh says, is to teach students “IT IQ”—the ability to understand when a piece of technology is useful and when it isn’t. Faculty directors and social scientists will be watching to evaluate what’s effective, he says.

Stephen C. Ehrmann, vice provost for teaching and learning at George Washington University and a founder of the Teaching Learning and Technology Group, a nonprofit organization promoting high-tech teaching methods, says he is “encouraged” by the Kentucky project. Often such ideas amount to “giving students and faculty a bunch of gadgets” and not much more, he says, but he likes that the A&S Wired program seems to have a curriculum that integrates the devices, and a way of evaluating what works and what doesn’t.

See Full Article (Chronicle of Higher Ed): Here

 

Best Social Media Mash-Ups in Higher Education

This is a really interesting post about social media and how some higher education schools are utilizing them. I took a little creative liberty and moved Vanderbilt to the top since they are one of my universities.

The hardest part of any cohesive social media campaign is pulling it all together.

It’s why I’m so impressed when colleges or universities embrace the social stream and preset it on their own terms in a creative and meaningful way. I’m not talking about social media directories where a school lists all its accounts.

I’m talking about a high-quality mash-up where colleges and universities wrangle feeds from blogs, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, and more to create a compelling page that gives a real-time snapshot of all an institution has to offer. (Hat tip to the folks over at mStonerblog; they have been talking about mash-ups for months.)

There are plenty of higher education mash-ups out there, but here are a few of my favorites:

Vanderbilt University

The Vanderbilt University social media mash-up keeps it simple. Blog, YouTube, and Twitter feeds come together to produce a Twitter-esque stream that’s easy to follow and scan. Additional social media options appear in tabs across the top of the page. It would be cool if users could subscribe to this stream with one click.

University of Maryland Baltimore County

The UMBC mash-up breaks down the social stream in more ways than I thought possible. It’s a great display of all that’s happening on or around campus but also a great resource to connect with students and organizations based on activity. There are tabs for students, photos, videos, tweets, blogs, music, and organizations. But just in case you want it all, the page defaults to “Everything.”

Missouri State University

Missouri State University compiles their social stream in a place of incredible prominence — directly onto the university home page. The stream pulls from university-related Twitter feeds, Facebook accounts, and news posts to fill the center “News & Events” column. It’s a great example of school embracing social media while providing fresh content to the home page throughout the course of a day.

Tufts University

The social media hub at Tufts University is a comprehensive endeavor to pull together multiple feeds into a single interface. There are tabs for Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, LinkedIn, and select university blogs. What I appreciate most is that Tufts simply didn’t pull the available widgets from each site, but took the code and customized it to match the look and feel already on the site.

Savannah College of Art and Design

The Savannah College of Art and Design bills itself as “The University for Creative Careers.” No surprise its social media mash-up is one of the most creative out there. The school puts its blog, Twitter, Flickr, and YouTube feeds into a 12-box slider that pulls text, pictures, and video into an interesting display.

College of William & Mary

The social stream at the College of William & Mary is easy to navigate and visually appealing, mainly because of its simplicity. Six boxes feed the latest from the stream, whether it’s a blog post, tweet, or uploaded photo. Viewing previous posts to the stream is as easy as selecting the numbers down the left side.

See full Article (Patrick Powers): Here

From Wall Street to Wal-Mart

I don’t know if I totally agree with this because this problem has always been around but, Are we these graduates really getting the skills they need for the future?

Colleges and universities are turning out graduates faster than America’s labor markets are creating jobs that traditionally have been reserved for those with degrees. More than one-third of current working graduates are in jobs that do not require a degree, and the proportion appears to be rising rapidly. Many of them are better described as “underemployed” rather than “gainfully employed.” Indeed, 60 percent of the increased college graduate population between 1992 and 2008 ended up in these lower skill jobs, raising real questions about the desirability of pushing to increase the proportion of Americans attending and graduating from four year colleges and universities. This, along with other evidence on the negative relationship between government higher education spending and economic growth, suggests we may have significantly “over invested”  public funds in colleges and universities.

There are many reasons for pursing a higher education. A few persons revel in the intellectual excitement of academic exploration, others “consume” not only the knowledge that college provides but all the social dimensions associated with it—alcoholic stimulated parties, erotic adventures with new friends, athletic events and intramural sport participation, etc. But for most persons, a significant, maybe even thedominant reason, for going to college is that it supposedly will improve one’s prospect of acquiring a good job. In a sense, a college degree has long been considered a ticket to the middle class—an adult life with a good income and relatively high job security. From the standpoint of society, efforts to expand college graduation attainment rates have been justified by President Obama and major foundations (for example, Lumina and Gates) on a need to be competitive with other nations which have a larger proportion of adults with college degrees.

This study argues that the conventional wisdom that going to college is a “human capital investment” with a high payoff is increasingly wrong. Evidence shows that currently more than one-third of college graduates hold jobs that governmental employment experts tell us require less than a college degree. That proportion of underemployed college graduates has tripled over the past four decades.

In 1976, Harvard economics professor Richard Freeman wrote about The Over-Educated American—at a time when most college graduates, at the margin, entered professional, managerial and scientific positions traditionally considered jobs for college graduates. If we were “overeducated” at that point in time, what is the case today? Moreover, the push to increase enrollments has led to a majority of the increment of our stock of  college graduates finding employment in relatively low skilled jobs, most of which are not particularly high paying (although there are exceptions). We added roughly 20 million college graduates to the population between 1992 and 2008, for example, but the number of graduates holding jobs requiring less-than-college education skill sets rose during that same period by about 12 million; in other words, 60 percent of the total increase in graduates over the past two decades was underemployed. Anecdotally, most persons can see this is their everyday lives. For example, the senior author was startled a year ago when the person he hired to cut down a tree had a master’s degree in history, the fellow who fixed his furnace was a mathematics graduate, and, more recently, a TSA airport inspector (whose job it was to insure that we took our shoes off while going through security) was a recent college graduate. Actually, these individuals are far more typical of many recent college graduates than is commonly supposed.

See full Article (Center for College Affordability): Here