My Technorati profile

Teachers: Embrace Technology or Students Will Leave You Behind

We ask our students to be good observers, consider the world carefully and to analyze the implications of what they see. As educators, it’s time we do the same.

Our classrooms may appear as we experienced them — a row of windows, a blackboard (OK, maybe they’re white now), inspirational posters. But the kids looking back from those same uncomfortable chairs are fundamentally different. They are like a Bronze Age tribe being asked to use stone axes. It’s time to put down the stone.

It’s true, no matter what we do, our kids will leave us behind — it’s the natural way. But we must provide them with the knowledge they need to improve the world. Our generation is the one developing all the new tools that offer limitless access to knowledge. So, why wouldn’t we offer these advantages — the ones kids can’t keep their fingers off of, even during class — and help kids acquire the skills they need to survive in a connected world?

To be fair, we have begun to transition away from “stone.” Textbooks, for example, are being digitized. But is that sufficient change? The good news is that our children will no longer be lugging twenty pounds of pulp on their backs. Revisions to their reading content can be updated on the fly, not each decade with new printings.

But is that really leveraging the full power of technology? If you think about how we use technology in our adult lives, it’s primarily a communication experience — email, WebEx, text messages and collaboration tools. It’s social, but we’re not letting these collaborative tools into the classroom.

We’d be blind not to recognize and utilize students’ inclination for social interaction and their obsession with mobile technology. This is our opportunity to join them on this side of the millennium. If we don’t, we will lose their attention, and to some degree, their respect. They know we’re teaching them, for the most part, like we were taught — like our parents were taught.

Here’s some typical summer AP English homework: “Read Walden and write a report on Thoreau’s theme.” I’d bet that SparkNotes sees a surge of traffic in the last week of summer. It’s not that Walden doesn’t contain big ideas relevant to today’s kids. But they’ll do better by constructing meaning from it socially — not alone with a text and a Google search for “Walden Thoreau Themes.” They need something tangible to learn by imitation or iteration, which is the way we all learn most everything. They need to see and hear what academic discourse sounds, looks and feels like.

I understand this is easier said than done. The best solutions are still being explored and developed. But there are many online resources that are changing education significantly. Companies are spending capital to develop interactive visions for math and science. curricula. There are some great solutions out there, and it’s just beginning. But it takes the will and desire for change to ensure today’s students are taught in a way that is relevant. If used correctly, the tools of the 21st century leverage the best of the old and build on the successes of traditional teaching.

See Full Article (Mashable): Here

 

Are For-Profit universities better educating students than traditional universities?

Andrew Rosen has written a great new book on higher education in America,Change.edu: Rebooting for the New Talent Economy.  It is provocative, insightful, and mostly correct. Yet, I predict, it will be largely ignored by the higher-education community.

Image via Google Images

One reason: Rosen is the CEO of Kaplan Higher Education, and probably viewed by many as a biased supporter of for-profit schools, rather than a serious commentator on the general strengths and weaknesses of America’s colleges and universities (this is somewhat ironic, since he has degrees from Duke and Yale, and has lots of nice things to say regarding traditional higher education).

Rosen makes five big points. First, higher education once in a great while is hit with a truly disruptive innovation. He cites the rise of the private-sector (for-profit) schools as one such disruption, and also considers the Morrill Act (which created land-grant schools) and the postwar explosive expansion of universities and community colleges as such examples of disruptive innovations.

Second, Rosen argues that many universities have lost sight of their noble mission because they have been stricken by Harvard Envy, trying to emulate the nation’s most prestigious schools.

Third, much of conventional higher education is an ever more expensive exercise in the dilution of learning and the development of frivolous resort communities (campuses) with emphasis on climbing walls, football, and luxury housing.

Fourth, the for-profits are incentivized to focus on student outcomes and learning—paying laser-like attention to this most critical mission of higher education.

Lastly, the attacks on the for-profits for various transgressions are wide of the mark, and, indeed, dollar for dollar, those schools deliver the best value to taxpayers for educating millions of Americans.

Of course, that is what you might expect a CEO of a for-profit college to say. But Rosen says it well, backed up with evidence. He repeats what other observers, including myself, have said for years.  Conventional higher education has largely lost its way, losing sight of its original and noble mission of educating large numbers of Americans at a reasonable cost. It has gotten caught up in a costly academic arms race to try to be Harvard, when we cannot have (or even afford) many Harvards.

See Full Article (Chronicle): Here

 

K12 Schools Say: iPads Motivate Kids to Learn

At three elementary schools in Clover, South Carolina, students can’t wait to see if there is a gray cart in their classroom. 

“I want you to go to the one we were working on with decimals,” said fifth grade teacher Jennifer Johnson as she handed out iPads to her math students.  The application they’re using reinforces a lesson she’s been teaching, and immediately, the children are immersed.

“We’re golden. I mean look at them. They’re engaged. They are ready to go. They will practice math all day long,” she said.

Next door to Johnson’s room, Megan Charles’ reading class is studying westward expansion and the book Hard Gold.

“They had to explain it in StoryKit, which is an app. They had to do an illustration,” Charles explained.

“Right now, I’m in the paint and I’m actually drawing a picture of Miss Eliza,” added student Catherine Faulkner, who also did an audio recording of her project.

“These games explain things better for me because I’m a visual learner,” said Logan Pubentz, also a fifth grader.

Ask Logan, Catherine and fellow student Jude Bechtel about working on the iPad and they’ll give you ever energetic responses.

“When you come in and see the iPad cart, you are really excited,” Catherine said.

“We get more oomph into it other than just paper and pencil,” Jude said.

“The teachers help us with it. It is not just like the iPad doing all the work,” Logan explained.

Teachers do make sure the technology isn’t used to babysit. Time is limited and all the applications the students use are pre-screened and tied to their lessons.

“This is a tool. And I think behind every tool is a good educator that knows how to use the tool,” Johnson said.

The school did assessments before the iPads went into classrooms 10 weeks ago. They’re expecting to see great improvement when they test again in the spring.

“Great gains, absolutely,” said Charles. “They just pick up technology.  It is very natural for them.”

It is so natural to them, that as NewsChannel 36 interviewed both teachers, the students paid little attention.

“I’m standing here interviewing you and these kids are paying no attention to us,” I joked.

“No. No. They are focused. This is the computer generation,” Johnson said.  “A lot of times they don’t even ask questions because they can solve their own problems,” Charles added.

In all, Larne Elementary has 90 iPads, and 75 are for students to use.  The school gets Title I funding and used a portion of that money to buy the technology.  Administrators say the iPads are serving not only as a teaching tool, but also a motivator.  Staff tells a story of a student who told his parent he had to go to school because he knew it was iPad day in one of his classes.

See Full Article (WCNC): Here